Who Dislikes National Socialism And Why?
Part 1. The Rebel Alliance
As of 2025, National Socialists basically have no institutional power of any type in any place, and they are few in number and scattered about geographically. As of now, National Socialism is growing worldwide; none the less, National Socialism is functionally a creature of the internet and not much else. As of the 2020s, an organization that operates in real life outside of the online sphere should be viewed with the highest level of suspicion because Jews create fake National Socialist organizations which serve as traps for the unwary. These traps have been nicknamed “Honeypots.”
Image courtesy of knowyourmeme.com
Despite National Socialists operating as scrappy underdogs at this time, a day will come when National Socialism once again holds the reins of governmental power. So long as National Socialism functions like the Rebel Alliance in the Star Wars Universe, there will be those who dislike National Socialism because the enemies of this ideology simply fear the results once National Socialism is holding the levers of power. (Some people such as pornography distributors and child-traffickers should rightly fear such an outcome.)
Image courtesy of OhMyGoshitsJosh on deviantart.com
While National Socialists are still playing the role of scrappy underdogs, some people will dislike this ideology because it disrupts the status quo and undermines the ruling ideology that dominates our present time. Many people have vested interests in our present degenerate system, or they simply like the present system for whatever their reasons might be; therefore, anything that might disrupt their present programs and lifestyles will not be liked. Anyone who is heavily invested in the present state of affairs will dislike National Socialism because the mere presence of this ideology undermines the legitimacy and power of present ruling governments. To phrase this concept in a different way, National Socialism is correctly interpreted as an existential threat to existing power structures due to its inherent nature; thus, National Socialism will have its share of present-day haters.
Part 2. The Usual Suspects…
When a National Socialist government holds the levers of power once more, such governments are likely to have enemies both foreign and domestic. Sure, Jews will resist the rise of any National Socialist government, even if such a government is not explicitly National Socialist in name. Jews also dislike governments that are only partially National Socialist in nature. Syria’s old Baathist party or Juan Peron’s governments of Argentina might also be examples of just such a thing. More than one source has speculated that once a society has more than 1/5 of one percent Jewish demographics, then Jewish-driven rot starts to permeate the entire fabric of society.
The image above shows Argentinian president Juan Peron in 1948. Image courtesy of wikipedia.org
National Socialist societies will always work to become as ethnically and racially homogenous as possible because National Socialism defines a “Nation” by “Blood.” The old concept of “Blood,” is now called “Genetics.” National Socialism sees a “Nation” as a “Blood” family writ large. The National Socialist way is to have many small and large rather homogenous “Ethno-States” that divide the world politically and genetically. Despite National Socialist efforts to create societies that are very homogenous and distinct from one another, some places such as the American South, parts of Brazil, or the nation of Namibia in southwestern Africa, may have Europeans living in the same places as non-European peoples. In such environments, Blacks will dislike National Socialism for many of the same reasons as Jews and for a host of their own particular reasons.
Part 3. Black National Socialism
Recent trends have uncovered a somewhat hidden current of Black Nationals Socialism that is developing across the Americas and elsewhere in the 2020s, so we must qualify any Black distaste for National Socialism by mentioning that some Blacks are in agreement with White National Socialism. The aims of Black National Socialist groups should be supported as far as such support is prudent for White National Socialists. The best outcome would be for Blacks to maintain their own ethnic homelands and to govern these places in manners that suit their collective folk soul. The problem with this arrangement is that some Blacks might genuinely long for ethnically pure Black homelands, yet most Blacks would privately or even publicly balk at the idea of living in ethnically homogenous Black nations.
Image courtesy of stablediffusion.com
The trouble with Blacks having their own nations is that such nations will inevitably be much poorer and less well-run than White nations, so there will always be many Blacks who wish to relocate to greener pastures in White homelands. Most Blacks would love to live in White-majority nations because such arrangements offer them better creature comforts, better job opportunities, and the pleasures of dealing with less corrupt and more efficient institutions. The point to remember is that most Blacks really do not want Whites to separate or vent to act in their own group interests because Blacks do not want to lose the benefits that accompany having Whites in their proximity.
Part 4. Black Distaste for Non-Black National Socialism
Any time that Whites wish to establish nations or even enclaves of their own, then these places will see a crush of Brown, Black, and even Yellow people who are clamoring to live there and enjoy the fruits that are created by Whites. The point to consider is that Whites might find themselves forced to live with non-Whites to some degree or another across our planet in the coming decades and centuries, and these foreign tribes will dislike White National Socialism for one reason or another.
When National Socialism is the dominant cultural and political entity, then this way of life will inevitably see its share of haters and it share of push-back from Blacks and Mulattos. Black race-grifters may claim that a White National Socialist government and and a White National Socialist way of life is “out to get them,” or they may claim that these societies are deliberately set up to treat them unfairly, and yes, there may be some truth to these accusations, but the real issue is STATUS.
Image courtesy of lexical.art
Under a White National Socialist order, Blacks will not enjoy a similar level of lionization and artificial inflation of their social status like they do when living in multi-racial societies where Jews are controlling cultural trends and even controlling national governments. Jews tend to use Blacks as a wrecking ball against Whites, and other groups as well, and this is why the Jews have been artificially inflating Black social status in Europe, the Americas, and elsewhere for the last 100+ years. On average, Blacks have lower intelligence, shorter time horizons, and poorer impulse control than other groups, so they are used to breed out and destroy groups that the Jews dislike, and this program is not just limited to Nordic Europeans.
It is worth noting that the Jews have a vendetta against the Japanese which goes back to the Russo-Japanese War that took place in the first decade of the 20th century. Imperial Japan had the nerve to fully pay back a huge loan from the Rothschilds, and this offence has not been forgotten by Jewish oligarchs. After the Imperial Japanese paid off a predatory Rothschild loan in full, international Jewry vowed to punish and destroy the nation of Japan and the Japanese people. The unnecessary nuking of Japan at the end of World War II is part of the Jewish vengeance plan against the land of the rising sun. As of now, international Jewry is pushing to import masses of sub-Saharan Africans and Pakistanis into Japan as a means of destroying the nation of Japan and the people of Japan themselves.
Image courtesy of imgflip.com
Blacks are also imported to wreak civil havoc through crime and rioting in places that the Jews have targeted for elimination and destabilization. The practice of using Blacks as a bioweapon will not work if a targeted nations operates under the auspices of their own versions of National Socialism.
If you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime….
Nations that are controlled by Jews make a point of favoring Blacks under their legal systems and using their control of mass media to hide Black crime. This Jewish process of hiding Black criminality and creating legal systems that favor Black criminals is done as a means of elevating Black social status; however, under a National Socialist system, including a Black National Socialist system, crime is punished.
Image courtesy of supawatcher111 on the r/forsen forum from Reddit.com
No Free Shit Zones
Under a National Socialist government welfare handouts will exist; however, these governmental social services will not be very easy to get, and they will come with huge number of provisos, conditions, and strings attached – this is not music to Black ears. A National Socialist order will not give Blacks and mulattos affirmative action programs which grant them preferred status, nor will hiring quotas for Blacks be in effect under a National Socialist order that is not Black.
Dating and Mating
Blacks also want easy access to Whites for the mating prospects that these situations foster for Blacks. Black mens’ collective desire to mate with White women is well known; however, upwardly mobile and ambitious Black women tend to seek White husbands. Race-mixing between Whites and Blacks is desirable for Blacks who wish to have children who are more intelligent and physically attractive, but such mating arrangements are detrimental to White individuals and White nations. From a Black perspective, White National Socialism represents a loss of choice mating prospects because this way of life does not support or facilitate interracial relationships.
It is also worth noting that both men and women from other races desire White mating partners as well as Blacks; it is well know that Indian and Arab men despise and resent White men, yet they cannot help but lust after White women and desire White women as mating partners. Many non-White women other than Blacks also seek White men as husbands and fathers for their children, so such women will dislike Whites practicing National Socialism because this way of life truncates their hopes of marrying White men.
The image above shows the cover of a real book which is sold on Amazon.com.
The No Compulsion Zone
Another point of discontent for Blacks concerning the practice of White National Socialism will be the unhappy prospect of living in a cultural environment that lacks the pervasive cult of Negro warship which Jews are always pushing within contemporary multi-racial societies. The Unz Review website has a contributor who goes by the name “Jung-Freud,” and this columnist has discussed the issue of Conversion, Convenience, and Compulsion. Basically, the term “Conversion” could be said to denote peoples’ relationship with the divine and their spirituality. The term “Convenience” could denote peoples’ quest to look for more physical comfort and ease in their lives.
“Compulsion” could represent the idea of what the old Jew named Sigmund Freud termed “Id.” Compulsion could be thought of as peoples’ lower and materialist nature pulling at their consciousness. Compulsion represents such issues as egotism, vanity, narcissism, selfishness, and pursuit of physical pleasures. Compulsions could also be said to reflect the old Catholic idea of the seven deadly sins. The idea of Compulsion is important to note here because when a society has achieved a high degree of comfort which falls under the auspices of “Convenience,” then the influences that are associated with “Conversion” lessen while the forces of “Compulsion” assumes more personal and societal influence.
Image courtesy of grunge.com
When a society has a high level of both Convenience and its concomitant high level of Compulsion, then Blacks tend to gain more admiration and social standing than they would when Conversion is more prominent. The point to consider for these principle is that Blacks benefit personally and on the group level when they live in multi-racial societies that are both decadent and permissive, but they especially fare well in societies that are wealthy, permissive, and decadent.
So, why do Blacks fare better in decadent societies that are also rife with things like homosexuality and transgenderism? The answer is that Blacks embody the principles of “Compulsion” and “Id” more so than any other group, so they gain more appreciation in societies with loose morals and decadent ways. Things like economic collapses and times of war are bad for Black status seekers because such times usher in more focus on principles such as spirituality, family life, self-sacrifice, discipline, and self-control, and these are all principles that constitute kryptonite for Blacks.
Image courtesy of memedroid.com
Essentially, decadence is largely a reflection of luxury lifestyles; this is why throughout history the upper classes tend to be libertines, gamblers, and drunkards more than the lower classes. The upper classes live more decadent and debauched lives simply because they can avoid the consequences that are wrought by their bad behavior much more than the less fortunate. If the upper classes are spared the need to earn livings, then the consequences of decadence and debauchery are less pressing. The principle of the upper classes enjoying the luxury of decadence can also be applied to decadent and prosperous societies such as Rome in its dying days and the later years of Babylon. Jews are also able to push their moral and spiritual rot in more prosperous and wealthy societies.
Fairness in Sports Under National Socialism
When Jews control a society’s radio networks, television networks, and film production business, then they are in a great position to artificially promote and lionize negroes. The favored methods for promoting the “Cult of Negro Worship” or “Negroidolatry” as Jung-Freud likes to call the practice of Jews leveraging their media pull and money to artificially boost Black fortunes. Jew have spent the last 100 years leveraging sports and entertainment as avenues to build up Black social and economic standing far past what it would be otherwise.
The image above shows the famous Black NBA player named Michael Jordan. Jordan was certainly a great basketball player in his time, but the point that we are making here is that individuals like Jordan were also overhyped and leveraged by Jews to promote warship of Blacks in general. Image courtesy of elfrente.com.co
Interestingly, many people of all colors have believed that Black achievement in high-level professional sports such as America’s NFL and the NBA along with Britain’s Premier League soccer league are the result of superior Black prowess in sports, but it turns out that this assumption is not really correct. A recent article that was posted on Kevin McDonald’s Occidental Observer website discussed how big-time professional sports has been manipulated by conniving Jewish franchise owners and league owners to favor Blacks over Whites, but also to favor Blacks over all other groups.
The Jews are favoring Blacks in pay and contract choices because this hidden discrimination elevates Black social status and wealth. It turns out that the Zio-American NFL is the world’s largest stamping mill for cranking out Black millionaires. It also turns out that a disproportionate number of the Black athletes who sign insanely lucrative sports contracts eventually prove to be nothing more than overpaid disappoints, but the cost of this chicanery is simply passed on to the gormless fans who never know any better. Essentially, Blacks are overrepresented in the NFL due to being artificially promoted and deliberately overpaid by Jewish league and franchise owners. This discrimination against White athletes is by no means limited to America’s NFL and NBA, this pattern is rampant in the selection profess for World Cup Soccer teams as well. Needless to say, such a de facto welfare system for elite Black athletes will not exist under a National Socialist order.
The image seen above shows a recent draft pick in the Zio_American NFL. The Black player seen above received a lavish contract, but like most Black athletes who get chosen in early NFL draft rounds, he is likely to become an overpaid disappointment. Image courtesy of battleredblog.com
The No Negro Music Zone
Any society that emphasizes hard work, delayed gratification, spiritual matters, and modesty is not going to give negroes a great day in the limelight. One big reason why negro music has been so popular across the Zio-American Empire since the 1950s is due to Jews owning and controlling the Zio-American music industry which includes owning the recording studios, the record producing companies, and monopolizing access to radio station networks and television appearances.
Yes, there have been, and still are, talented negro musicians and singers, and not all these performers are direct promoters of cultural rot; that having been said, negro music would not be the cultural phenomenon that it has been if Jews were not relentlessly pushing this stuff onto the unsuspecting hoi polloi.
Let us not forget the Jewish rapper BLP Kosher, what a fine fellow. Image courtesy of aish.com
Under a National Socialist order, negro music may not be directly suppressed, but it will not be artificially promoted and lionized either. If negro music is not artificially hyped and ballyhooed by Jews for the purpose of promoting moral rot, then negro music will only enjoy a niche and limited popularity amongst those who are not Black. Contrary to the narrative that Jews relentlessly push, negro music is not really all that great. Rap has actually been falling in public popularity for years as of the 2020s, and this decline in rap’s popularity has progressed despite well-funded Jewish efforts to maintain its popularity. Simply put, under a National Socialist order Black music and dance will not have much popularity outside of Black circles, and this state if affairs will not serve Black interests nor stoke Black egos. This lack of state-sponsored lionization represents one more reason that Blacks will not like National Socialism, particularly when it is practiced by Whites.
Lastly, under a National Socialist government and social order, freedom of association will be permitted and acknowledged, unlike it is now, so Blacks will not have the privilege of leveraging legislation and the court system to force their way into White spaces where they are really not welcome.
The image above shows the famous “Little Rock 9” incident from 1957 where Little Rock Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas was forcefully desegregated at gunpoint by orders of the Zio-American president Dwight D. Eisenhower.
At that time, White residents of Little Rock warned that desegregating American cities would eventually render such places unlivable for Whites which in turn would lead to a long and slow decline of the cities into states of ruin. It turns out that these predictions were spot-on correct and places such as Baltimore, Maryland and Detroit, Michigan serve as prime examples of what happens when Whites and Blacks are forced to live in the same places. Forced integration between Whites and Blacks leads to Whites fleeing the area and leaving nothing but Blacks in the abandoned area. Areas that have been abandoned by Whites soon slip into decay and dire poverty as the old segregationist produced so many years ago. The image above is furnished courtesy of Britanica.com
Forcing their way into White spaces is always a Black agenda item whether the setting is Apartheid-era South Africa or the old Antebellum American South; however, a National Socialist system would not permit Whites to be be forced into situations where they can never claim any cultural or physical spaces of their own. One of the big agenda items for Jews has been to destroy and remove any places where Whites can reserve their own physical spaces, economic interests, or cultural spaces. However, whenever Jews have their way, the right to claim spaces for Jews seems to persist for some odd funny reason.
The No Race-Grifting Zone and The No Victim-Card Zone
Under a National Socialist government, some ethnic groups will also clamor for more media time because they wish to have standards fudged to further their group’s collective interest, plus they intend to leverage the “Victim Card” or the “Victim Narrative” to accomplish this task. Essentially, playing the victim is a well-established method for one group to extract resources from another group by misappropriating the other group’s sense of fair play and honesty. The favored old Black strategy for extracting resources from Whites and others is to claim something to this effect: “We Black people are always judged unfavorably without good reason; therefore, we cannot get a fair chance in this society.…ergo, we need laws put into place that protect us from the effects of such pre-judgements. These unfair judgements against us are made by universities, police departments, and employers.”
In such cases where Blacks and others make appeals to the White public’s sense of fairness as a countermeasure against claims of unfair bias, these claims might hold at least some validity; none the less, such complaining about the system being rigged is really little more than a ploy to extract resources from Whites. Black and Brown calls for redressing injustices are not really sensible calls to redress wrongs but machiavellian plans to acquire resources. If National Socialist leadership holds frank and public discussions about race realism, then this strategy of playing the unfairly judged victim will not gain much traction for Blacks and other underperforming groups. Under National Socialist governance, the gospel of race realism may not always be shouted from the rooftops; however, race realism will certainly guide public policies. Understanding race realism acts as a National Socialist bulwark against underperforming ethnic groups leveraging the victim card to gain advantages.
Image courtesy of imgflip.com
Playing the victim card works well enough when looking to extract resources from people who are caring and compassionate by nature. Playing the victim card as a means of extracting resources is a well-established practice amongst beggars and street people; why do you think that Roma Gypsies deliberately break the legs of their own children on occasion, then place these children out on the streets as beggars? Why? Because the more pathetic and hopeless that a beggar can appear, the more money that a beggar will collect while out on begging rounds. Yes, peoples’ caring nature can be exploited by the cunning and unprincipled; however, playing the victim card always includes an element of deception and a desire for plunder amongst those who employ this strategy.
Under a National Socialist government and social order, those who are in need of socialist support will not automatically be denied needed services. That having been said, National Socialism places a high emphasis on personal accountability and race realism, so the usual Black peoples’ and Brown peoples’ plays to leverage the sympathy of Whites as a strategy for gaining unearned resources and status will not meet with nearly as much success as it would when Jewish rulership and governance is in place.
Image courtesy of NezukoRanpadeviart07 on deviantart.com
Even if a Jewish presence persists within a National Socialist society and this presence has been reduced to the point where Jews account for 0.02% of the overall demographics by one means of another, then there will still be contingents of non-Jewish people who dislike National Socialism for a host of reasons.
Part 5. White Shit Liberals and Their Discontent
Author’s Note About White Shit Liberals:
I live in a very liberal area in Southern California, and unfortunately, entirely too many of my immediate and extended family member are very liberal, or they are what might be called “Shit Liberals.” Even if I cannot really understand WHY Shit Liberals do the things they do, I can at least offer good predictions of WHAT they will do. My point is, liberal-leaning Whites will dislike National Socialism for various reasons.
Image courtesy of imgflip.com
Hans-Joachim Marseille was a decorated combat pilot during World War II, and many military historians consider him to be the best fighter pilot in any theater of war from 1936 to 1945. Despite being a gifted combat pilot, Marseille seems to have been a left-wing shit liberal type at heart. Marseille did such things as publicly insult Hitler in person and snub Hitler’s requests for him to attend personal meetings. Marseille was reportedly fascinated with Negro music and culture, and he sought out friendships with negroes wherever he could find them. Marseille was also a notorious drinker and womanizer, and he was a very well-known fan of jazz, so he always sought out negro and non-negro jazz musicians wherever he could find them. As of the 2020’s, jazz is no longer really a negro thing because jazz has been long eclipsed by rap as the Black music de jour.
Image of Hans Joachim Marseille courtesy of wikipedia.org
Today, jazz is by no means a mainstream interest and jazz is no longer associated with counterculture of any kind. In more contemporary times, jazz tends to be a thing for nerdy types who are on the autism spectrum. As of the 2020s, Jazz has also graduated to being a pastime the highly educated; however, there was a time when jazz was associated with liberalism, Negro culture, and counterculture. Interestingly, the earliest known jazz recordings and live jazz performances were done by White men in the New Orleans area, so jazz is not really the Black phenomenon that some might imagine.
Marseille reportedly went far out of his way to befriended the small number of negro workers who served as ground crew assistants at German airfields during the Third Reich’s North Africa campaign against the British. Unfortunately, we will be stuck the with the Hans Marseille’s of the world for a while to come, so National Socialism will have its share of internal haters.
Image courtesy of imgflip.com
So yes, Jews are the immediate go-to group for those who would dislike any National Socialist government, but other groups of haters will inevitably arise as time passes. Some people actually have a degenerate living preference for whatever those reasons might be, and there are some types of people who will dislike the rise of National Socialist governments and their accompanying social orders because such ways of life run contrary to their personal tastes and interests.
No matter what transpires, Jewish enticements to pursue unhealthy, hedonistic, and degenerate lifestyles will always have at least some receptive and enthusiastic audience within any society.
The kinds of people who are friendly and receptive to rhetoric that endorses vice and degeneracy will be the same ones who complain about being denied access to media within a National Socialist society.
No matter how good and well-functioning a National Socialist society might be, some people will inevitably find this way of life boring, stodgy, prudish, and confining. No National Socialist government can cater to every last person’s taste and preference in a perfect manner.
Part 6. Traditional Gender Roles and Their Discontents
Yes, the traditional family structure for European people that emphasizes monogamy, and marriage has been proven to be the best way to run a technologically advanced or “developed” civilization; none the less, there will always be a certain minority of people who find this way of life confining, stogey, and boring.
Having well-defined gender roles was the normal state of affairs throughout almost all of human history across every race and every ethnic group, yet a minority of people always have some confusion about their own gender identity and some people will always find traditional gender roles perhaps a bit confining and prudish. Inevitably, some people will find a National Socialist society’s penchant for celebrating and encouraging clearly defined gender identities distasteful, confining, dull, and unpleasant; however, living within the confines of solid gender identities has been the norm for practically all people across time and space.
Image courtesy of LAINE on pinterest.com
Part 7. Traditional Family Life and Its Discontents
Men who like to womanize will dislike living in a society that emphasizes monogamy and responsible fatherhood. Polygamists and aspiring polygamists would certainly have a big dislike for any social order that places a high emphasis on traditional European family structures; therefore, such people will always be agitating for more sexual libertinism. The Thule Society has also previously discussed how polygamy is not a good way to run any society.
Polygamy can take many forms, such as a situation where one man is hustling several women and stringing them along without making any commitments. The rise of contemporary “Situationships” actually signifies how de-facto polygamy is becoming more common across the West. Any traditional European society, whether National Socialist or not, puts restrictions on the activities of male “Players,” “Hustlers,” and philanders. National Socialism and other traditional European societies such as Conservative Catholic culture or Conservative Protestant culture will always have their share of detractors from the likes of philanderers and aspiring polygamists.
Image courtesy of imgflip.com
Women who are promiscuous also dislike the National Socialist way of life because such a system “cramps their style” a bit and forces them to live with a bit less sexual variety and novelty. Some women will inevitably not marry at all, and some women will not marry well, so these women will perhaps find themselves unhappy with the folkways of a society that places a high emphasis on women getting married and staying married.
Undoubtedly, some men and women find marriage confining and dull to one degree or another, but sexual libertinism is not the best formula for bringing about personal happiness nor is it a good way to maintain a well-functioning society. Libertine sexual morals are not a very good practice for any society, so it comes as no surprise that Jews always advocate for more libertine sexual ways for other groups but not for themselves. The upshot of some people finding traditional marriage confining and dull is the presence of media and commentators who advocate for more acceptance of marital infidelity, some form(s) of polygamy, and loose libertine sexual morals.
Image courtesy of someecardes.com
Part 8. The Feminist Factor and Its Discontents
A certain number of women will always dislike the idea of marrying and having children in place of pursuing careers or chasing sexual thrills; therefore, these people will inevitably have some degree of dislike for living in a National Socialist society that values marriage and family above career advancement for women. In a National Socialist society, no woman is required to marry at all, and any type of forced or coerced marriages are strictly forbidden, yet some women will dislike their society’s social pressures to settle down, to marry and to have children. A certain amount of social pressure to marry and have children is just the way of the world for both men and women.
Some women are inherently homosexual in nature, and some women simply cannot conform to traditional ideas of femininity; thus, these two groups of women will inevitably dislike a social order that revers traditional femininity. Some women will inevitably be unhappy in a society that champions traditional gender roles, even if most women like traditional femininity and are comfortable being wives and mothers before being careerists.
Image courtesy of Alfred Naples on drawception.com
Part 9. Beta Males and Their Discontent
Men who are physically weak and have low testosterone levels also dislike social orders that place a high premium on traditional masculinity. A National Socialist society places high emphasis on attributes such as stoicism, self-reliance, physical fitness, martial courage, and having a solid work ethic, plus National Socialism places a high degree of emphasis placed on the virtue of personal accountability; thing is, these traits are all traditional masculine virtues. Not surprisingly, some men who are deficient in traditional masculine virtues to one degree of another will gravitate to Jewish Bolshevism because Bolshevism offers them advantages that they would not have otherwise.
Low testosterone “Beta Male” types champion women’s empowerment and feminism because such feminized social orders serve their personal interest. Men who are less than perfect examples of traditional masculine virtues will have better mating prospects, higher social status, and improved economic opportunities in feminized societies, so such men will not like National Socialist ideology. The trouble with this arrangement that Beta Males seek is historical records indicating that when females assume more institutional power over a society, then that society tends to become ever more dysfunctional. Despite all his numerous moral and personal shortcomings, Jorden B Peterson has produced a few good videos that clarify which types of men support feminism and womens’ collective empowerment; Peterson also outlines these Beta Male interests and motives for supporting feminism in a few of his lectures.
Image courtesy of knowyourmeme.com
Part 10. The Homosexual Factor
As for the issue of homosexuality, every society has homosexuality happening to some degree of another, so there will always be closeted homosexuals moving about at any given time and place. Societies that preach against homosexuality are always hypocritical to some degree, so the apologists for homosexuals and those who advocate for homosexual interests are never entirely wrong when they call out their society’s disingenuous nature concerning the matter of homosexuality. If homosexual advocates look for societal hypocrisy concerning the topic of homosexuality, then they will inevitably find plenty of hypocrisy and they will find plenty of closeted homosexuality.
Image courtesy of GAY WOJAK on X.com
Homosexual advocates are at least partially correct in their assertions, yet the existence of these truths does not mean that people should support craziness like homosexual marriage or homosexual adoptions for children. Homosexual identity politics inevitably desires to make homosexuals into a protected class through legislation or social convention; however, any time that a group of people receives special and protected designations by formal law or by social convention, then that group become a privileged class one way or another. Homosexuals should never receive preferred status before the law nor in matters such as receiving loans, hiring practices, university admission, or doling out business contracts. Whenever identity politics is practiced, there may be claims that everybody is equal, but some people are always more equal than others.
The author and lecturer Camille Paglia has noted that when a society very openly endorsed and practices homosexuality, then this state of affairs precedes that society’s downfall. As Paglia avers, whenever homosexuality is very openly practiced and widespread, this is an indication of a weak, decadent, and dying society, so it should come as no surprise that Jews are always promoting homosexuality amongst those outside of their tribe. Homosexuality is like murder or theft in the sense that homosexuality will always be happening to some degree just like the proclivities of theft and murder; however, the intransigence of these proclivities does not mean that people should encourage or endorse such things simply because they will never entirely vanish.
A National Socialist society will not light homosexual on fire, nor will such a society toss homosexuals from various high locations; however, a National Socialist society will not be very friendly to homosexual agendas nor homosexual identity politics. Let it be said that those who are looking to gain more status for homosexuals and to further homosexual group interests will be endlessly clamoring for more access to media and more protective legal strictures for homosexuals within a National Socialist society in hopes of advancing their own agendas.
Part 11. The Rich Men North of Richmond
The very rich are also likely to harbor a certain dislike for National Socialism because National Socialist politics, economics, and social morals tend to place restrictions on their ability to accumulate ever more wealth. National Socialism also places very real restrictions on the over-class’s ability to do whatever they please politically and in their private lives. So, let it be said that whatever a status quo might be, and no matter how rotten and dysfunctional a given status quo might be, there will still be some people who have a vested interest in maintaining that status quo.
Image courtesy of Wojak on X.com
Part 12. The Accusation of Moral Weakness
The point to remember is that after a National Socialist government takes root, there will be a list of people who will wish to attack such a political system and such a social order through the usual media channels. Those who dislike Nationals Socialism will certainly attack National Socialist restrictions against public speech and print by accusing National Socialist of having moral weakness and insecurity. These dislikers of National Socialism will essentially wheel out an argument that goes something like this: “You have to censor us Liberals, Jews, and Communists/Progressives (i.e. degenerates) because your beliefs are too weak to withstand real criticism.” The haters of National Socialism will also proffer talking points such as “We are just unselfishly pointing out the holes in your idiotic ideology, and calling out of your National Socialist hypocrisy needs to be done for the good of society.”
Remember, if the “Moral Weakness” argument is ever proffered to attack whatever restrictions that National Socialists might place on public broadcasting and print media, then these talking points are just leverage mechanisms for pushing deeper agendas. Thus, when opponents of National Socialisms whine about having their media access curbed; remember, many of these people are really interested in nothing more than promoting more libertine and perverse sexual morals of all types and stripes. Some people might push for more sexual license for their own personal reasons or perhaps they might push for more libertine sexual ways as a means to knowingly harm society.
Image courtesy of knowyourmeme.com
Other haters of National Socialism are interested in attacking the traditional family structure for the same personal and political reasons that include destroying and undermining National Socialist society. This undermining of Folkish society might include pushing for homosexuality, libertinism, polygamy, and feminist agendas. Some people want to attack traditional gender identity because they are wrestling with their own gender identity issues, or they may want to weaponize this issue to destroy Volkish society.
Other haters of National Socialism include the greedy who want more unrestrained freedom for the rich to loot society’s wealth and despoil the environment without restrictions or accountability. These same people also want more freedom for the rich to outsource jobs and import alien populations to serve as pools of domestic cheap labor.
Those who would complain about censorship within a National Socialist society never do so for noble reasons.
