Part One – Origins of the Word “Journalism”

The word “Journalism” is French in origin. In France, circa the early 18th Century, a custom developed among certain well-to-do Frenchmen, and this custom involved informally touring around Europe and its environs. I call this practice where well-heeled Frenchmen traveled about Europe and points further afield a custom because this type of activity was not in any sense an organized practice. As these posh Gauls traveled about Europe, they kept real-time journals of their experiences, and these paper journals included written records of their observations, their analyses, and their impressions. Thus, these fine Frenchies came to be known as les Journalists. These old French travelers’ journals were far, far, more than just simple diaries.

Image courtesy of FrenchPepe_ on X.com

These early French journalists were well educated, both formally and in a self-taught sort of manner. When these early Francophone journalists returned home to France after finishing their latest travel adventure, it was customary to have these journals published. These journals that were published by French “journalists” became highly prized resources for the French Government, including the French military. These early French journalists were noted for their objectivity and honesty. Very often, these published “Journalist” records of travel were the only reliable sources of information about distant places, and these journals that were made by wealthy French travelers were the only good source of information about certain less-visited areas within nearby countries and even within France itself! Journalistic accounts provided the French government with references that described the domestic circumstances, economies, agriculture, resources, and military capabilities of foreign nations and even backwater parts of France.

Part Two – The Education, or the Lack Thereof, for Modern “Journalists”

Schools of journalism now focus on two things exclusively.

First, modern journalism schools focus on how large corporate news organizations are administered. At these graduate-school journalism programs, each prospective journalist is taught how to stay in their place if they wish to keep a job. This lesson set boils down to simply saying: “Keep your mouth shut and do as we tell you to do, say what we tell you to say, and write what we tell you to write.”

Second, journalism students are told how to present themselves; there is a big emphasis placed on Public Speaking, but also on ACTING. The curriculums for university and liberal arts college Drama Majors and Journalism Majors share many courses. The individuals who go through master’s-degree-level journalism schools are also taught how to cultivate a public-facing physical image that people will naturally be attracted to. Ideally, journalists should be sexy women and pretty boys. A lot of the training within journalism schools involves public speaking, and this same training is designed to drill the exclusive use of Standard American English into each student (forget all about Southern drawls). The intention is to have every trace of a local dialect, or a local culture, purged from each person who attends journalism school. Each journalist of a given gender becomes interchangeable with every other journalist of that same gender, and no loyalty to one’s native local culture is allowed to remain for these graduates.

Image courtesy of knowyourmeme.com 

What most assuredly is not taught at university journalism schools is genuine Investigative Journalism. Real investigative journalism still exists, but it is now relegated to “citizen journalism” that operates on a true shoe-string budget and typically publishes on the internet or in small-circulation print magazines. These brave “Citizen Journalists” who work without pay and usually publish over the internet still face a lot of obstacles to sharing their messages. Suppression measures that are leveled against citizen journalists include being de-monetized and de-platformed, and even outright arrested and bluntly censored!

Citizen journalists are a threat to any empire that is built on a foundation of lies. Not surprisingly, the government of Mainland China truly hates citizen journalists, but so do the governments of India, the Zio-American Empire, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, Zionist-occupied Germany, and countless other federalized jurisdictions. The government of Mexico hates citizen journalists because these people are continually exposing Mexico’s governmental corruption at all levels; however, Mexico’s drug cartels also hate and fear courageous citizen journalists because these investigators expose so many of the dirty deeds that are done by Mexican drug cartels. Shedding public light on corruption and bad deeds is the first step towards eliminating so much of the evil that plagues our world; thus, bad actors or all stripes and types dread having their actions and their character exposed for public scrutiny. It seems that the more relevant question to ask would be, “What large government does not hate citizen journalists?”

Image courtesy of knowyourmeme.com

Instead of being taught how to investigate matters properly, each student who attends a university journalism program is taught how to present what their (((editors))) tell them to present. The few genuine Investigative Journalists that are still out there, and they are becoming scarcer by the day, must be self-educated in their field and they must also be self-employed. Another thing that is not taught at university journalism schools is anything at all that would give their students background understandings about what subjects they just might find themselves reporting. It is always helpful for journalists to have decent understandings about history, science, economics, sociology, anthropology, religion, culture, etc.

JEWS are always given first preference whenever admissions boards go about granting access to journalism schools. Second comes Blacks, and a distant third comes Latinos, then comes everyone else….as for Whites, well…..

 

Part Three – The Circumstances of the Modern “Journalist”

I will now stop using the term “Journalist” when referring to these people, and I will now start using the most appropriate term for them: PROPAGANDISTS! These university-minted propagandists who larp as “journalists,” “reporters,” or “investigators” may look good, and they may actually know how to tell a story with some level or competence, but they are still among the most ignorant people that you will ever run across. Their profession is a lucrative one that is ideally suited for vane, greedy, and ignorant people who also have no scruples (kind of like the politicians who now operate in Zionist-occupied jurisdictions). If being a professional “Journalist” is all about being vane, greedy, prejudicial, and ignorant, then Jews are obviously a natural fit for such endeavors. Whatever their other shortcomings might be, these same “Journalist” propagandists are experts at looking good and talking convincingly. In the Metropolitan Atlanta Television Market back in the late 80’s, starting pay for a new television “journalist” was a cool quarter of a million. 

Image courtesy of Fartgravy on memedroid.com

Part Four – Journalism in the Third Reich

Right from the beginning of the Third Reich, all the German Press was brought under the Ministry of Propaganda’s control. The Ministry of Propaganda was captained by Dr. Joseph Goebbels. The reason why all the Third Reich’s public discourse was controlled by one organization was because all too many of the existing newspapers were Jewish-owned before Hitler became Germany’s chancellor. Germany’s Jewish-owned newspapers were all very subversive against the German government and subversive against the German people as a whole. (Does this sound familiar?) Indeed, Jewish-owned newspapers had been subverting and undermining the welfare of Germany’s people going back into the Second Reich and all throughout the Weimar Republic. Before the Third Reich ruled greater Germany, Jewish magazines, Jewish newspapers, Jewish book publishers, Jewish film producers, and Jewish radio stations were nothing more than mouthpieces for International Jewry in general and Jewish Bolshevism in particular.

The danger that an independent press posed to the new National Socialist government of Germany was that uncontrolled broadcasting and publishing would give free rein to Jewish Bolshevik agitation. (Sound familiar?) The term “Propaganda” when used within the context of Dr. Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda has a different meaning than it would when we examine present-day Jewish propagandists who masquerade as “journalists.” The “Propaganda” of the Third Reich should be understood to mean “Education.” The Third Reich’s policy towards news and entertainment was as such: Give people the true facts, then then let them decide for themselves.

Image courtesy of ggame.io

Adolf Hitler defined intelligence as the ability to engage in independent analytical reasoning, so the NSDAP knew that they had nothing to fear from people asking tough questions. The Truth never has any reason to fear honest analyses, as Hitler, Goebbels, and company well knew. On the other hand, the Jewish Press’s job from its very beginning back in the 1840s was to undermine, mislead, and deceive everybody who was not Jewish.

Jewish media that began in the first days of mass-circulation for newspapers was established for the purpose of brainwashing the masses in ways that benefit Jews, and Jewish-controlled mass media has continued with this same program until the present day.

The Jewish motive behind controlling mass media is: Dumb the population down, then bury them with bullshit. This is the exact opposite of what Dr. Goebbels’s ministry sought to do. Goebbels is famously quoted as saying, “Tell a big enough lie and keep it up long enough, then people will start to believe it is the truth.” Dr. Goebbels is also quoted as writing, “Lie, lie, lie, sooner or later something will stick.” Goebbels did indeed write the quotes that were just written earlier, but he was describing how the Jews have always operated, including their Jewish “Lugenpress.” (The term “Lugenpress” is the German word meaning “Lying Press.”)

Image courtesy of makeameme.org

During World War II, each division of the Waffen SS and the Wehrmacht maintained a Propaganda Company as an integral part of that division’s TO&E (Table of Organization and Equipment). These Propaganda Companies recorded what was happening out in the field both on film and in writing. Propaganda Companies also recorded what was happening with photographs and illustrations so that Dr. Goebbels’s ministry could keep the German People well informed about what was happening. For National Socialism to work, there must be a well-educated and honestly educated populace who are given ready access to the facts, and this making sure that the public was well informed was the job of German military propaganda companies.

 

Part Five – Some Personal Observations

I grew up watching the mechanizations and skullduggery of the Jewish Lugenpress during the so-called “Civil Rights Era” in the American South. I clearly remember seeing the big events of the “Civil Rights” mythology literally unfold in front of my own eyes. The Jewish Lugenpress reported events during the times of “The Civil Rights Era” that never happened while refusing to report the events that did happen. However, most of the time, the Jewish Lugenpress simply reported actual events that happened in the South during the “Civil Rights Movement”; none the less, the Jews reported these happenings in a manner that resulted in their canards bearing little or no resemblance to what actually took place.

The purpose of these Jewish media distortions that surrounded the events of “The Civil Rights Movement” was to play Blacks and Whites against each other as part of a Jewish & Corporatist strategy to “divide and conquer.” The Jews practiced a “Divide and Conquer” program across the South during the 1960s to deceive the rest of the country who were not there in the South to see for themselves what was really happening. I wish I had the time to write a book about those “Civil Rights” times in the American South because a long book is precisely what it would take to outline just what I personally saw happening.

Image courtesy of of the r/WojakTemplate forum on reddit.com 

A Few Quick Notes about Mass Media

by James Rousse

If we are going to discuss the issues that pertain to the lying Jewish media and its effects on the public, then taking a bit of time to look at media technology itself seems to be in order. Jewish media basically fits into about four categories, that being: newspapers, magazines, radio, and television. Film and book publishing along with the recorded music industry have historically been huge channels for Jewish brainwashing; however, these mediums are  primarily used for disseminating subversive Jewish entertainment as opposed to reporting on happenings in a news format.

The internet is really a fairly new phenomenon since it has only been in widespread public use since about 1996, yet there are now younger people who have never known life without the internet. Unlike other types of media, the internet is much more decentralized and much more resistant to censorship than older modes of media, plus the internet is much more interactive than older media channels. In high of its unique traits, the internet can be considered a different animal than older media technologies. Radio might have featured call-in programs, as did local television on some occasions, but in general, the audience cannot engage in active interfacing with radio programming to the same degree as can with the internet material.  For example, the internet often permits comments on its media feeds, and people can do things like click on hypertext links that are found within internet publications – no such possibilities exist with older media technologies.

Image courtesy of Mara on Pinterest.com

Newspapers

Newspapers are worth noting because they are the oldest form of mass media. Newspapers are still printed and distributed up to the present day, but this medium for disseminating information, or disseminating propaganda, does not enjoy the cultural or economic relevance that is did before the internet entered our public arena. Even as late as the 1990s and early 2000s, newspapers were still a huge source of media and most individuals along with most collective households maintained newspaper subscriptions. In this case, the term “Collective Households” refers to single-family residences where married couples lived with their children. In the 1990s, it was very common for individual people and family households to maintain subscriptions for both local newspapers and larger newspaper publications such as the New York Times or the San Francisco Chronicle, depending on one’s area of residence.

Today, many younger people have reached their 20s without ever having lived in a household that maintained a newspaper subscription, nor have these young people ever maintained any personal paper newspaper subscriptions themselves. The internet has greatly reduced the old newspaper medium to the point where reading or subscribing to an old-style newspaper that is actually printed on paper is almost a foreign idea to many teenagers and twenty-somethings.

Image courtesy of Pepe The Fren on jp.pinterest.com 

So, is the relative demise of paper-printed newspapers a bad thing? It is hard to say if the relative demise of newspapers is bad because as of the 2020s people still read a lot of news articles, but they are just doing this reading on their computers or smartphones as opposed to reading text that is printed on pieces of rough and disposable paper. One advantage that traditional newspapers offer is greater information retention and increased attention spans for readers. Reading the exact some text on printed paper as opposed to an LCD screen increases information retention and keeps the reader focused and engaged a longer periods of time. Given the advantages offered by reading from physical printed material, it comes as no surprise that the many elite private schools now eschew using computers as teaching tools as much as possible. Traditional newspapers require more money and work to produce than simply creating and maintaining accounts on social media networks or maintaining publications on websites; thus, for dissidents using old newspaper technology does not make much sense in today’s world.

A discussion about newspapers is relevant for National Socialists because before Hitler assumed the Germany’s office of Chancellor in 1933, something like 9 out of the 11 largest newspapers in Germany were owned and controlled by Jews, and for that time and place newspapers were the main way of sharing information along with shaping public opinions and perceptions. During the 1920s, radio had not yet percolated to the masses, therefore newspapers were the primary and dominant media format for that time, and this was true everywhere around the world. During the Weimar Republic of the 1920s, Jewish interests used their control of newspapers to mislead, gaslight, deceive and brainwash the German people in ways that only suited Jewish needs. Despite the heavy Jewish influence of Germany’s major newspapers, many rank-and-file German citizens still saw through the lies and longed for a more honest media establishment that served the interests of German people and not just Jews.

Image courtesy of Wrapped Pepe on X.com

The 1840’s marked the beginning of modern mass-media because this was the first time that industrial technology permitted cheap newspapers to be printed in huge numbers on a daily basis. Prior to the 1840s, newspapers did exist, but they were printed on paper that was made from recycled linen rags and old pieces of cotton cloth. When people were printing early newspapers, each page had to be manually pressed by a Gutenberg-style printing press, so although newspapers did exist before the 1840s, they were much shorter, they were much more expensive to publish, and they were printed much less frequently. For example, the old “Gazette” newspapers of Northern Italy were single page publications that were printed about once per week.

The arrive of modern wood-pulping mills, plus the invention of the Fourdrinier Machines in the 1840s, meant that paper could  be cheaply and quickly manufactured in virtually unlimited quantities by using raw logs as the starting point as opposed to using old scraps of cloth. Mass paper production also arrived at around the same time as automated machines for mass paper printing, so the large newspaper as we understand such a thing was born.

Image courtesy of comtechhistory.site

Early industrial newspapers were made from wood-derived paper and these media channels were printed with steam-powered and water-wheel-powered printing presses. Industrial paper manufacturing generally falls into two categories, that being Kraft paper and Hollander paper. Hollander paper is made by simply grinding wood pulp by mechanical action within machines that circulate the wet wood pulp mixture around a curved trough that resembles an ovular racetrack. After the wood is pulped inside of Hollander machines, this ground up wood mash is fed into Fourdrinier machines to make paper. The Term “Hollander” derives from the origin of this technique being the windmill powered paper mills of the Netherlands.

By contrast, Kraft paper is made by chemically breaking down wood chips with a process that uses sodium hydroxide. Hollander paper is much courser to the touch and much less expensive than Kraft paper, so Hollander paper is used to manufacture toilet paper, newspapers, cardboard, and paper towels among many other things. By contrast, Kraft paper is more expensive, but this type of paper is also smoother and less prone to bleaching in light or decaying over time, so kraft paper is generally used for printing books, magazines, posters, and cards. Kraft paper also constitutes the material that feeds contemporary computer printers.

The year 1814 also marked an interesting turning point for publishers because this was the year that a printing press which created text on two sides of a paper first appeared. Later, roller presses that could print on two sides of a large paper sheet were developed, and these large water-wheel-driven or steam-powered machines permitted true rapid mass printing for books, magazines, and newspapers.

The image above shows one of Richard March Hoe’s steam powered rotary printing press. Hoe patented his invention in 1847, and it was this automated printing press of Hoe’s that represented one of the greatest advances if printing history since Guetenburg first invented the printing press.

As soon as the White man’s technology permitted mass media to arrive in the form of cheap and daily newspapers that were produced with industrial technology, this is when Jews saw a golden opportunity to gain power over unsuspecting European populations. Mass production of newspapers began on a once-daily basis, then eventually newspapers were printed in a thrice-daily process. In the 19^th and early 20^th centuries, many larger cities released morning newspaper editions, afternoon newspaper editions, plus evening editions of the same paper. At the heigh of newspaper’s popularity as a medium, editions were also printed each and every day of the year.

It was the 1840s when electrical telegraph lines first began crossing Europe and North America, but by the 1860s, the telegraph permitted newspaper stories to cross continents within minutes which then permitted an even greater degree of standardized mass media. Telegraph lines not only gave media outlets a greater reach than they had before the electrical telegraph was invented, and telegraph networks also centralized media content in a manner that would not have been possible otherwise. 1915 also marked the first time that at transcontinental telephone call was made between New York and San Francisco, so telephone lines soon expanded the reach of syndicated newspapers and magazines. Equipment that was specifically designed to transmit written text across telephone lines did not emerge until the 1930s, but vocal transmission of newspaper articles by having on person read the article while a shorthand stenographer recorded the text on the other end of the line was certainly possible as soon as long-distance telephone services became available.

The image above shows an old Morse Electrical Telegraph. The image seen above is furnished courtesy of wikipedia.org

The Associated Press organization began as a conglomerate of five major New York City newspapers in 1846. The Associated Press was originally formed to share the costs of transporting news stories overland by horse express, but the arrival of telegraphs, and the later arrival telephone lines, transformed the Associated Press into a monolithic organization that still pushes the same party lines which unofficially govern news reporting, and this suppression of real news on the part of Reuters and AP persists to this day. Reuters is the British version of America’s Associated Press. Whatever their origins might be, as of today, both Reuters and the Associated Press drive Jewish propaganda in a monolithic fashion.

Technology allows news reporting to have a longer reach that is both cross-national and cross-continental which was not possible in the days of horse travel, but this increased reach also comes with increased centralization. Increased centralization and consolidation of news media services opens the door for small but conniving and nefarious groups ,such as the Jews to gain monopolistic power over all mainstream media reporting.

The topic of “Yellow Journalism” is also worth mentioning at some point if discussions about newspapers are in order. Historians consider Joseph Pulitzer to be the founder of Yellow Journalism when he ran the Saint Louis Post Dispatch newspaper. After his time with the Saint Louis Post Dispatch, Pulitzer later assumed ownership of the New York World newspaper in 1883. Pulitzer became the New York World’s owner after making his Saint Louis paper the largest in that market. Pulitzer was a Jewish immigrant from Hungary, and his style of journalism was known for doing things like pushing for sensationalism and attention-grabbing headlines; however, Pulitzers newspapers were also notorious for ignoring things like objectivity, journalistic integrity, and fact checking. Once could argue that Pulitzer’s New York World was the first true appearance of the mass-market Jewish Lugenpress.

The image above shows Joseph Pulitzer. Image courtesy of wikipedia.org 

Pulitzers style of journalism was also noted for its lack of depth and its focus on crime, sex, scandals, celebrity gossip, and sports. Pulitzer’s style of newspaper was also relatively short and inexpensive by that day’s standards and Pulitzer’s papers were known for being very biased and partisan in their left-wing political outlook. Pulitzer’s methods of publishing saw the newspaper medium as a means of shaping political discourse and as a means of making a lot of money, but Pulitzer also viewed the newspaper industry as a pulpit for promoting causes that benefitted Jewish interests.

Pulitzer may have died in 1911, but his New York World newspaper stayed in business until 1931 where it served as a mouthpiece for “progressive” causes and left-wing politics. Pulitzer’s real legacy was turning news media into a partisan circus that catered to a low denominator and ignored facts in favor of selling emotional dopamine hits along with peddling simplified and dumbed-down narratives. Like it or not, the ideas of Pulitzer live on today in the way that newspapers and television reporting happenings. Pulitzer basically dragged the noble traditions of news journalism into the mud, and the institution of mass journalism has never really changed nor recovered from Pulitzer’s errant ways since his death. Unfortunately, Pulitzer’s tendency to cater to the public’s lower brain functions achieved some degree of popularity and this business practices made a lot of money for the newspaper men, so Pulitzer’s ideas were imitated by others such as William Randolph Hearst.

The image seen above shows the New York World Building circa 1905. The New York World building was one of Manhattan’s early skyscrapers. Image courtesy of wikipedia.org

The arrival of an ever-greater and an ever-more-centralized mass media complex simply opened the door for more Jewish propaganda to percolate through the consciousness of the masses. Likewise, magazines trace their origin back to the 1600s, but early magazines tended to have small circulations due to facing high production costs along with cumbersome and expensive distribution networks. However, like with the newspaper business, magazines fell in price as printing and paper production technology improved.

Magazines

Like traditional newspapers, magazines that are actually printed on real paper are still around, but this medium has shrunk in both its size and its social relevance. In the 1990s, and even up into the 21st century’s first decade, paper magazines were still found in countless places such as grocery stores, convenience stores, book retailers, school libraries and public libraries. Back as late as the 1990s and early 2000s, many stores of all types and stripes still stocked huge and expansive racks that were filled with paper magazines, but such things are now for the most part a bygone thing. The teenagers and twenty-somethings of today have now grown up without seeing much of the ubiquitous magazine rack nor have most of them ever maintained a subscription to a paper-printed magazine that is delivered by postal service on a weekly or monthly basis.

The image seen above shows a rural mail carrier in Indiana circa 1901. The image above is furnished courtesy of about.usps.com

The Postal Act of 1879 gave American magazines lower postage rates, but this time frame also coincided with improvements in steam-powered rotary printing presses, so mass-circulation magazines became a real cultural phenomenon in the 1880s and particularly in the 1890s. The Zio-American Empire has maintained a taxpayer-supported federal postal service since 1792, which was after the Postal Service Act was passed, and by 1872, the postal service became a cabinet-level position with the Zio-American government.

The image seen above shows a transport mail wagon in Boston circe 1895. The wagon seen above transported huge amounts of mail between post offices. Well up into the 20th century, it was still common for people to simply collect their mail at post offices as opposed to having their mail delivered to their offices or places of residence. The image seen above is furnished courtesy of about.usps.com

Despite being officially founded in 1792, the year 1775 marked the time when the first Colonial Continental Congress in North America voted to form a dedicated colonial postal service that was funded by taxpayers. The point to consider here is that having a functioning national postal service is a big boost for creating and sustaining a mass-market magazine industry. Newsstands were formerly a significant source of sales for paper magazines, but the real financial drive behind this medium was, and still is, paid subscriptions that involve magazines arriving regularly by mail. In the 1970s, around 35% of all American magazine sales took place at stores and newsstands, but as of the 2020s, direct retail purchases account for  3% of the magazines which are ever read by the public.

The image above shows a magazine rack at the Birmingham International Airport in England. Airports are one place where traditional paper magazine sales still remain brisk. Image courtesy of dfnionline.com

By the 1890s, American magazines posted subscription-based readership numbers that went into the hundreds of thousands, and by the 1920s, some magazines posted subscriber counts in the millions. By around 1900, advertising became crucial source of revenue for magazine publishers. Not surprisingly, by the 1890s, magazines became a big method for shaping public opinions and herding public discourse into manageable corrals, so it comes as no surprise that Jews were very enthusiastic about getting in on the magazine publishing business once circulation levels were high enough for this medium to permit mass-scale mind programming.

Like with the relative death of paper newspapers, is the relative demise of printed paper magazines a bad thing? As mentioned earlier, reading from a physical book or a piece of paper increases the attention spans, reading comprehension, and retention of information for readers in comparison to reading from a computer for smartphone screen; however, people are still reading plenty of articles on LCD screen in the 2020s. Despite the ease and low cost that is associated with publishing online, paper magazines can actually be printed without too much money being spent, and small circulation magazines are nothing new. For example, in 1990s, the popularity of “Zines,” or small circulation magazines increased; however, publishing paper magazines still does not offer the same wide reach and low cost as publishing online.

Independent neighborhood bookstores are great places to sell and distribute zeins, but this route of promotion is really off limits for National Socialists. Independent bookstores love to carry Marxist zeins and they love to stock zeins that are published by other types of left-wingers, but forget about having independent book stores carry anything that offers a non-left wing perspective on anything. Image courtesy of thrillist.com 

The only real advantage that might be offered by magazines for dissidents in the 2020s is the fact that paper magazines can be disseminated with a degree of stealth that no electronic medium can match. National Socialists in present-day Germany have used, and continue to use, paper magazines that are sent through the German national postal service as a means of sharing information. These forbidden National Socialist paper-printed magazines are shipped in covered envelopes, and these same forbidden periodicals are often picked up at mail drops where they are received under assumed names, so it is very hard to censor this medium when it is used skillfully. Many of the subscriptions that are made for these forbidden magazines are paid up front and paid in cash, plus many of these subscriptions are established at parties and music performances, so this medium can offer a high degree of stealth. Paper magazines can also be swapped between people without leaving any digital signature, so that is one more reason that this medium is potentially hard to censor and track.

Printing paper magazines typically requires some use of electricity to operate the printing equipment, but the process of printing paper magazines still produces no digital communications that a crooked government’s artificial intelligence programs can intercept. Small printing machines can be operated in basements, in workshops, in garages, in barns, and inside of storage sheds, so shutting down underground printing shops is a tall order for any group of despots. Magazines may be a decent tool for sharing information about National Socialism in very censored and restrictive places during the 2020s such as Great Britain or the Russian Federation.

Radio and Television

Radio was a huge form of mass media from around 1930 until about 1955 because the middle of the 1950s marked the arrival of television for the masses; however, radio did not immediately die after television’s arrival. As late as the early 2000s, FM radio was still a hugely popular avenue for listening to music, as was AM radio for broadcasting talk shows. AM radio does not offer the same music fidelity as FM radio, but AM radio has a wider reach over distances, so back in the 1990s the Republican political party took full advantage of AM radio’s relative lack of popularity and comparatively low broadcasting costs to spread their message. Rush Limbaugh is the most well-known of the old AM radio fossil-conservative personalities, but Neil Boortz and Sean Hannity are also worth mentioning.

The 1990s saw the rise of Paleo-Conservative talk radio which in turn eventually led to a profound effect on voting patterns. The “Paleo-Conservatives” who listened to 1990s and 2000s “right-wing” radio programs were old and out-of-tune with cultural trends even in those years, so Paleoconservativism is just a reflection of ideas from the 1950s and the years predating 1967 that still have neglected to take their proper dirt nap. When we refer to “Paleoconservatives” this group can be described as being White men who were born before 1967 that have conservative leanings. The Paleoconservatives who listened these old and dusty AM radio programs back in the 1990s and early 2000s were past-it and out of touch with contemporary reality even as early as the 1990s; none the less, millions of these living fossils are still around in the 2020s and they have a lot of wealth tied up in real estate ownership and securities investment portfolios, plus they still vote religiously and they still donate to political causes. (money talks)

Image courtesy of imgflip.com

The rise of Paleo-conservative radio personalities in the 1990s and early 2000 is not really applicable to National Socialists of the 2020s because Paleoconservatives were always rabidly pro-Israel and many of these fossils were rabidly pro-Jew on account of being Evangelical Protestant Christians. The old fossil conservatives really took the classic conservative stance which is a strictly defensive and losing philosophical position; none the less, being a simple and brain-dead conservative is still a socially and politically safe position to take. These old fossil conservatives alleged that the television set was biased towards liberals and left-wingers back in the 1990s. As it turned out, actual investigations and studies proved that the fossils conservatives were factually correct on this point, so the old Paleoconservatives looked to AM talk radio as their party’s media outlet. The old paleoconservative broadcasters were not really political dissidents in a true sense, so they never ran afoul of America’s Jewish rulers, but the success of fossil conservative radio programs proves that reinvesting in clunky old media technologies can have surprising payoffs.

As of the 2020s, satellite radio has become more popular and internet-based music streaming and podcasts have certainly made traditional broadcast radio less popular. Before internet use became truly widespread during the early 2000s, radio was still a hugely popular medium. In the 1990s local radio stations were very popular and they created a strong sense of community identity, and local radio personalities often eared celebrity status within their limited community circles. Unlike satellite radio or internet-based podcasts, old radio broadcasting typically operated in real time, and popular radio personalities often hosted their real-time broadcasts from trendy local bars, music festivals, and other community events like county fairs, so old broadcast radio offers a sense of local community connection that podcasts and satellite radio do not possess. Podcasts can be paused at any time, and they can be listened to at any time, which is convenient; however, podcasts lack the real-time spontaneity that old radio still offers.

The image seen above shows a 2025 local radio broadcast happening live from the McHenry County Fair in upstate New York. The on-location radio broadcast is still not dead.. Image courtesy of wgnradio.com 

In a general sense, broadcasting with the spoken word alone offers the advantage of creating stronger emotional impressions than video broadcasting because the absence of visual imaging for radio and podcast programs forces listeners to use their imaginations in order to process whatever information is being presented. Broadcasts that have no visual information also lend themselves well to multi-taking among their listeners, of course, this penchant for multitasking works best when the tasks that people are performing while listening to radio or podcast programs do not demand too much cognitive energy. Listening to radio or podcast programming while doing things like driving, exercising, gardening, or taking care of housecleaning chores works well, and this ability to perform routine tasks while listing to an auditory program of some type partially explains the contemporary popularity of podcasts and old radio programming.

In the days before the internet, radio stations kind of acted like the beating hearts of communities. For example, in the 1990s television show called Northern Exposure, one of the main characters is Chris Stevens. Chris was the host of the local radio station’s morning show that everyone in the fictitious town of Sicily, Alaska listens to religiously. For the resident of Sicily, Alaska; listening to Chris’s morning radio show was a ritual that bound the community together and updated everyone on the happenings within the area.

The image above shows a promotional picture for the televisions series named Northern Exposure. A set which contains every Northern Exposure television episode is available for purchase on Amazon.com. Image courtesy of amazon.com

In Spike Lee’s film Do the Right Thing, the neighborhood in Brooklyn where this film takes place has a small low-wattage radio station that kind of acts as the pulse of this neighborhood. The rise of subscription-based satellite radio along with the rise of internet-based streaming services and podcasts has pretty much snuffed the life out of the local radio station; thus, those who were born into “Generation X” are pretty much the last group of people that grew up enjoying the classic radio experience. Radio still maintains some popularity for driving commuters and some people still listen to radio stations in the workplace, but traditional radio is a waning institution in the 2020s.

It is a shame that generations of young people who were born after 1995 are now growing up without experiencing the local connection that is offered by radio stations, and they are missing out on the antics of local radio “Shock Jocks”  as well. For those who are too young to remember the true days of radio, Shock Jocks were radio personalities who were almost always young White men, and these young men reveled in shocking their audience and pushing the boundaries of social acceptability. Interestingly, the Shock Jock avocation was never much of a female, “Colored,” or Black phenomenon.

The image above shows 27 year old Minnesota radio personality Aaron Imholte. Young Mr. Imholte runs a radio show in the 2020s, but the is a throwback to classic radio shock jocks from his parents’ day. Image courtesy of twincities.com

Old radio Shock Jocks often hosted real-time telephone calls while broadcasting and they typically asked their call-in guests the most touchy and embarrassing questions that they could think up. The Shock Jocks also loved to describe hypothetical situations, then they liked to ask their guests what they would do in such imagined scenarios. Shock Jocks also tended to poke fun at non-White people, homosexuals, and other protected groups in today’s world, so the Shock Jock phenomenon worked well enough in the 1980s and 1990s, but these same young men would run into serious problems if their old routines were done in later decades.

Fortunately, “Cancel Culture and “Political Correctness” were not really as prevalent when Shock Jocks were doing their thing. Back in the 1990s, a radio station named KSJO (92.3 “The Rock”), which broadcast from a studio located in the downtown area of San Jose, California; had an estimated nine million daily listeners scattered across Northern California. In its heyday, KSJO’s main format was rock music, so their audience was primarily White; thus, KSJO was notorious for having White Shock Jock radio personalities that mercilessly made fun of the Blacks who were living in the Bay Area cities of Hayward and Oakland. Back in the 1980s and 1990s, Asians, Hispanics, Indians, and Middle Easterners were also never spared the rod by KSJO’s ruthless and crude White Shock Jocks. (92.3 FM, KSJO is now owned by Indians, so this venerable old rock station now plays a Bollywood music format.) Shock Jocks also loved to make prank telephone calls and broadcast these calls on their live radio shows. Admittedly, some of their antics were downright crude and tasteless, and some of their antics were actually spiteful and mean-spirited, but if nothing else, the old Shock Jocks of yore were quite entertaining.

The image seen above shows a classic KSJO logo from its days as a popular rock music station in the 1980s and 1990s. image courtesy of depop.com 

Radio broadcasting requires consuming electricity and powerful radio broadcasting equipment requires regular maintenance. Performing regular maintenance of commercial radio broadcasting equipment requires some degree of technical expertise, so such routine repairs and maintenance of radio broadcasting equipment require spending money. To make matters worse, powerful commercial-grade radio broadcasting equipment is not cheap to acquire, so there is somewhat of a barrier for dissidents to operate radio stations. Small and relatively low-powered radio stations may not cost much to start, and their power consumption may not be cripplingly expensive, but their broadcasting reach may not be so great. Unlicensed radio signals can also be triangulated by hostile governments and other unfriendly organizations, plus operating a radio station legally requires government permitting, so the medium of radio broadcasting brings dissidents little advantage over internet-based podcasting for the present moment, at least in the United States.

Radio may have first begun broadcasting on a small scale back in the 1920s, but radio did not permeate to the masses until the early 1930s. A discussion about radio’s Golden Age is germain because Adolf Hitler did deliver many of his speeches by way of syndicated radio broadcasts. In the spring of 1933, which was soon after Hitler had assumed the office of German Chancellor on the 30th of January in 1933, the Chancellor and Goebbels both worked out an agreement with several German radio manufactures to produce cheap vacuum tube radios called “Volksempfänger” or “Peoples Radios.” These Peoples’ Radios were produced by the millions up until 1945 and they accounted for around 75% of all German radio sales in 1934. In the spring of 1933, the Third Reich also erected many more radio towers in order to make radio broadcasts accessible to the total German population, even people who were living out in far-flung rural areas.

The image above shows an old German Volkskempfanger type of radio from the 1930s. Image courtesy of wikipedia.org

Before the rise of television as a mass media technology, radio dominated as both a source of entertainment and a means of receiving news. The 1920s marked the mass adoption of vacuum tube technology which in turn permitted much cheaper radios to be manufactured. Early vacuum tube radios were not only cheaper to manufacture, but they were also able to intercept incoming signals with much better clarity than the old lead crystal radio models. During the 1920s, the Atlantic Telephone & Telegraph company, which is commonly known as AT&T, began experimenting with transmitting radio shows across long-distance land-based telephone lines, so national radio broadcasting syndication was a possibility well before radio technology became truly widespread.

Soon after radio technology became established as a channel for mass media, national governments began to regulate and censor this medium. The Federal Radio Act of 1927 was the American Government’s first move to control radio media. America’s Federal Communications Commission, or the “FCC” for short, was established in 1934. (Most likely, these governmental regulating bodies that oversaw the radio industry were really a case of Jews acting from behind the scenes.)

From the start, television was an outgrowth of radio broadcasting; however, television is still a different medium than radio. Television technology followed a multi-decade development arc beginning in the 1800s and progressing into the early cathode ray color television sets of the 1960s. Television’s development arc has now progressed into the LCD flat-screen models of the 2020s. Despite having working color television sets as early as the 1930s, television did not truly become a mainstream media source until about 1960. The year of 1960 is a significant year when discussing television technology because this year marked a point where 90% of American households included at least one television set. By contrast, in 1950 only 9% of American households stocked a television set.

Image courtesy of I.telegraph.co.uk

From its very start, the content that played on television sets was controlled by Jews, so the social changes that television has driven over the decades progressed with predictably bad results. The television set is not called “The Electric” Jew without good reason. Of all the types of media that the public is exposed to, television is probably the worst of them all due to this medium’s tendency to produce knee-jerk types of emotional reactions as opposed to encouraging thought and introspection. The written word tends to inspire thought and analysis by its very nature, and this push towards thought and analysis applies to whatever written information is being presented; however, watching film clips tends to just stimulate rapid and mindless emotional responses. Television’s ability to bypass peoples’ penchants for reasoning and analysis tends to make television a great tool for manipulating peoples’ feelings and emotions sans reason and logical analysis.

To make matters worse, the technical nature of television tends to have troubling effects on peoples’ minds. For example, regardless of what content is being shown on a television set, the act of watching television itself puts peoples’ minds in “Alpha Wave” states. The human brain’s Alpha Wave operation mode is associated with relaxation and daydreaming which is a meditative state where people are much more susceptible to suggestions of any kind in the first place.

Image courtesy of stock.adobe.com 

Television has also been a favored media format for totalitarian governments not just because this technology offers such great tools for brainwashing and gaslighting the public, but television is also popular with despots because this medium lends itself to monopolization and centralized control. The high capital investment that is needed to acquire television broadcasting equipment puts access of this technology out of reach for political dissidents, so it comes as no surprise that many bad actors love the television set.

As of the 2020s, traditional old pre-internet television networks such as FOX, CBS, ABC, and NBC are still around, but these old television networks are slowly going the way of radio and printed newspapers because the internet has assumed precedence. In the years preceding the internet, a handful of large television networks that were all controlled by Jews were the only game in town for disseminating news media other than AM radio, magazines, and newspapers, so centralization and censorship for news media was much easier in the days before the internet.

The internet is interactive on a personal level by its very nature, so the internet allows television shows and movies to be called up on demand; for this reason, everybody can pick and choose what they consume in a way that was not possible in the days before the internet. The internet’s inherent customization lends itself to personalized convenience in a way that other mediums lack, so the old television network is now a bit of a dinosaur.

Image courtesy of stock.adobe.com

Fortunately, the internet’s rise in social prominence has permitted decentralized discourse that would not have been possible in the past. The internet’s decentralized nature has also permitted the rise of citizen journalists in a manner that was not previously possible, and the internet has additionally allowed people with limited resources and limited connections to create large audiences; therefore, this state of affairs is not well liked by those who seek to control masses of people by way of brainwashing. Brainwashing the public by leveraging media technologies includes controlling (((official narratives))), (((official explanations,))) and (((the official story lines.)))

True, the internet’s decentralized nature militates against suppression of truth, and the internet’s very nature militates against one party controlling all of society’s narratives; however, the decentralized and democratic nature of the internet also lends itself well to all sorts of low-level people promoting disinformation and lying. Despite its problems with disseminating disinformation, without the internet National Socialism would not be enjoying the international renaissance that it is currently seeing in the 2020s. Keeping National Socialism out of the public area is absolutely predicated on maintaining intense censorship, and the internet has helped to make the job of censors much more difficult.

Image courtesy of freepik.com

Part Six – Concluding Remarks

I thought that this particular piece of writing would give my fellow Thule Society members along with other National Socialists, plus the general public, a deeper understanding of how our unwanted Jewish Lugenpress complex operates. We can all see what the Jewish Lugenpress does, but I hope this writing will help other people gain a better understanding about the Jewish Luggenpress’s history. I have also contrasted the Jewish Lugenpress with the True Journalism of Dr. Goebbels.

Obviously, what National Socialists need is some type of Press Organ like the ministry of Dr. Goebbels to replace the limitless Jewish Lugenpress propagandizing that is now defecated out of our present governing system. We must replace our current endless tide of Jewish fibbing and perfidy with something that will make the truth known to the masses. As things stand, a small number of people are listening to our messages and joining in our quest. These people who are now joining us in our quest would not be doing so without the internet, of this I am absolutely convinced. As for the others who are not taking our messages to heart…well as the old saying goes, “They have made their beds, now let them lie in them.” Despite us not reaching the number of people that we would like, at least we have tried; this is all that Our Fuhrer asks of us

Heil Hitler deva!

-88-

Randall Lee Hilburn